.svg)
Key Takeaways
- 1📊 1996 World Cup saw Australia and WI skip matches in Sri Lanka
- 2🏆 Sri Lanka still went on to win that World Cup title
- 3💡 Security, politics and scheduling often collide at ICC events
- 4🔮 Bangladesh’s 2026 stance could reshape group-stage dynamics
"While the BCB and the ICC work out whether Bangladesh will play the 2026 T20 World Cup in India or not, we revisit other instances of teams refusing to play an ICC tournament in a host country"
Security debates around Bangladesh and the 2026 T20 World Cup in India have reopened an uncomfortable but familiar chapter in ICC history – moments when teams simply said, “No, thank you” to playing in certain host nations or cities.
From 1996 boycott to 2026 flashpoint
Back in the 1996 ODI World Cup, Australia and West Indies refused to travel to Sri Lanka after a bombing in Colombo, forcing Sri Lanka to collect walkovers and altering the balance of the tournament before a ball was bowled. The irony: Australia went on to reach the final and then lost the title to Sri Lanka, the very team they had declined to face in Colombo.
Over the decades, security perceptions, political tensions and player safety have repeatedly collided with ICC scheduling. Neutral venues, forfeited fixtures and hastily reworked itineraries have all been used as band-aids when teams drew the line.
Now, with BCB raising red flags about playing World Cup fixtures in India and exploring alternatives, the pattern feels eerily familiar. Once again, administrators are stuck between commercial commitments, security assessments and the emotional toll on players asked to perform under a cloud.
For fans, especially in the subcontinent, it is a reminder that World Cups are not just about form and conditions; sometimes, off-field realities decide who plays where – and who lifts the trophy.
Related Stories
